Pseudoarchaeology is the interpretation of the past from outside the archaeological science community. These interpretations reject the accepted data gathering and analytical methods of this discipline.
Some pseudoarchaeological theories revolve around the idea that prehistoric and ancient human societies were aided by intelligent extraterrestrial life. Pseudoarchaeology can be practiced intentionally or unintentionally.
Archaeological frauds and hoaxes are considered intentional pseudoarchaeology. Genuine archaeological finds may be unintentionally converted to pseudoarchaeology through unscientific interpretation.
Academic archaeologists have heavily criticized pseudoarchaeology, characterizing it as relying on “sensationalism, misuse of logic and evidence, misunderstanding of the scientific method, and internal contradictions in their arguments”.
Pseudoarcheologists report their own non-scientific interpretations, but without any scientific peer review or analysis by professional archaeologists. No professionals that back up his statements and his conclusions are based on insufficient evidence. They use exaggeration of evidence, dramatic or romanticized conclusions, fallacy, and fabrication of evidence.
Pseudoarcheology has core characteristics: Lack of scientific method, Opposition to the archaeological establishment, Nationalist motivations and Religious motivations.
Some of the pseudoarcheology authors are Giorgio Tsoukalos, Erich von Däniken, Zecharia Sitchin, Robert Bauval, Graham Hancock.
Further reading and suggested videos :
When Pseudoarchaeology Causes Harm – Archaeology Review (ahotcupofjoe.net)
Do you like this topic? Find out more!